Technically speaking, Christianity doesn't have a problem with it either.Įx: Adam had two wives, though nobody likes to talk about the first one (Lilith was kind of a psychotic bitch), God was totally chill with Solomon having a hojillion wives, and in fact held him up as an exemplar of what people should try to be (and gave Solomon a magic ring that let him command All The Demons), and the biggest polygamous relationship in existence can be accredited to none other than Jesus of Nazarath himself, as all Nuns past, present, and future are, by definition, the Brides of Christ.Ĭhristianity doesn't have rules about it so much as it, historically speaking, doesn't actually care one way or the other. and, anyway, is anyone writing this (or planning to) or is this whole thread just a conceptual discussion? Additionally, household slaves (that is, ones not used for heavy labour) were used for 'entertainment', both of the owner and of guests visiting, particularly when the master of the household had that weekly get-together with his buddies.Īnd then there's, of course, the Spartan creepy marriage traditions which involved kidnapping, women pretending to be men by dressing like one and by shaving their head and other shenanigans.īut this whole debate is beside the point.
#SEKIREI AKITSU WINGED FREE#
This was why the Theban Sacred Band was looked down upon, it was common knowledge that they did engage in actual, not merely oral sex, despite being free men. frowned upon as being unworthy of a free male (note the word free, doing it with your slave was perfectly fine as long as it wasn't the slave doing the penetrating). Homosexual relations were fair game, though in male/male relationships penetration was. Women were largely ignored in Antiquity Hellas, though, yeah, bisexuality was pretty standard. It's a matter of being willing and able to work for it.Īre the Sekirei polyamorous? demonstrably not given that their entire design revolves around a bond of love with one person.Īre they perfectly capable of being in polygamous relationships anyway? yep.Īre they incapable of feeling emotional kinship with other sekirei, or even humans, and working with those people to manage their relationships? Probably no more or less than humans, once you peel away the usual harem anime baggage.ĭoes any sekirei fic need to be a harem fic? noĬlick to expand. It's not a matter of being 'wired' for it. Not flawlessly with never any conflict, there is always conflict in relationships, but manageable conflict that was dealt with sensibly and maturely. Or others were there were more than three people and the lines of 'who cares romantically about who and who is fucking who when' got ridiculously tangled. But I've also seen relationships where two people agreed to share a third's time and attentions, and they generally worked out fine. You can get more involved, I've seen some relationships that are actually a triangle rather than a V, and those are fine for people who feel that way. They bring in magical bonds, or just assume that everyone is bisexual and polyamorous, or a bunch of other shit that they assume is needed to make it work.Īll that is needed is three people, two of which are having a relationship with the third. A whole bunch of people have no fucking idea what they're talking about. The issue with people writing multiple partner relationships is the same one with people writing romance in general.
#SEKIREI AKITSU WINGED SERIAL#
Monogamy and serial monogamy can also be sustainable relationship types, for some people. All of these relationship types are possible and sustainable, for some people.Īll of this is opposed by the more common (in most english speaking countries anyway) idea of serial monogamy, one pair coupling at a time.
Polygyny is specifically multiple females and one male, polyandry is multiple males and one female. Lets start from the top, polygamy is just a marriage (or more broadly a relationship) with more than two partners, this can be two girls and a guy, three guys, two guys and a girl, three girls, etc.
and anyone here ever actually been part of or right next to an actual, working polygamous relationship? Polygamy does not mean lack of jealousy, polyamory is not a movement so much as a descriptor.
0 kommentar(er)
